Using artificial intelligence in the institution is not the same as managing artificial intelligence in the institution.
ISO 42001 Training; yapay zeka kullanan, geliştiren veya hazır yapay zeka servislerini iş süreçlerine alan kurumlar için yapay zeka ynetimini başından sonuna kadar ele alır. Katılımcılar standardın ne istediğini, kurum içinde hangi politikaların ve kontrollerin gerektiğini, riskleri nasıl değerlendireceklerini ve KVKK’nın iş yerlerinde üretken yapay zeka kullanımına dair beklentilerini sade bir dille ğrenir.
The use of artificial intelligence is not management alone; When the institution binds this with rules, records and control, it becomes a management system.
Artificial intelligence is already in use in many institutions. Employees print e-mails, summarize documents, produce images, and print codes. The problem is that this usage is often invisible on the enterprise side. Which tool is used, with which data, for what purpose, and by whom? The answer is often unknown.
This is exactly where ISO 42001 comes into play. Standard; It requires tying the use of artificial intelligence to a policy, determining responsibilities, assessing risks, measuring impacts, keeping external services under control and monitoring results. This training simplifies what the standard requires; It reinforces each topic with concrete examples of how to apply it within the institution.
Eğitim, KVKK’nın iş yerlerinde üretken yapay zeka kullanımına dair beklentilerini birebir kapsar.
Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurumu, iş yerlerinde üretken yapay zeka araçlarının kullanımına ynelik bir rehber yayımladı. Rehber; glge yapay zeka, otomasyon n yargısı, ticari sır paylaşımı ve kurum içi politika ihtiyacı gibi başlıklarda kurumlara somut beklentiler getiriyor. Eğitim, bu beklentileri ISO 42001’in kontrol setiyle eşleştirir.
Basic messages of the KVKK guide
The guide recommends that institutions do not ban productive artificial intelligence tools, but use them consciously and regularly. Because even in institutions that completely ban it, employees continue to use these tools through their personal devices. This becomes more dangerous for the institution.
According to the guide, institutions; It should write the rules of use, determine which data can be shared with artificial intelligence tools, inform employees regularly, and ensure that artificial intelligence outputs are used as a supporting element rather than the final decision.
The training has been prepared with reference to the full text of the guide: KVKK — Use of Productive Artificial Intelligence Tools in Workplaces
- The use of shadow AI creates risks beyond corporate control.
- Trade secrets, source code and customer data should not be shared across tools.
- Over-reliance on AI output creates automation bias.
- Banning artificial intelligence completely is not a solution, its use should be regulated.
- Institutions must write and announce an artificial intelligence usage policy.
- Employees should receive regular information and awareness training.
Participants learn to evaluate artificial intelligence management together on the axis of policy, risk and daily use.
The training brings standard knowledge to real scenarios. Each title; The use of in-house artificial intelligence is discussed through working examples with ready-made tools and warnings in the KVKK guide.
ISO 42001’i sade bir dille açıklar.
What the standard requires, on which subjects it expects rules to be written, and its common or different aspects with ISO 27001; It is explained with examples without drowning in technical jargon.
- Purpose and field of application of the standard
- Map of nine control heads
- Relationship with the current information security system
Establishes artificial intelligence policy and responsibility structure.
Artificial intelligence usage policy, ethical principles, internal AI committee structure and who is responsible for what are clearly defined.
- AI usage policy template
- AI committee roles
- Escalation and decision paths
It manages the unique risks of artificial intelligence.
Risk types such as bias, wrong but fluent answer (hallucination), inability to explain the decision, personal data in the training data and theft of the model are handled practically.
- AI risk types
- Risk level determination
- Integration into existing risk management
It measures the impact of artificial intelligence on people.
How to evaluate and record the possible impact of an artificial intelligence application on employees, customers, applicants and sensitive groups is studied.
- Impact assessment template
- Vulnerable group and the fairness view
- Conditions for human intervention in the decision
It manages artificial intelligence from start to finish.
You are taught which control will be applied at each stage, from need definition to data collection, from validating the model to going live, from monitoring to decommissioning when necessary.
- Data quality and data source
- Approval of the model and its transition to live
- Monitoring, error trapping and recall
It establishes common ground with the KVKK guide and the EU regulation.
KVKK’nın iş yerlerinde üretken yapay zeka rehberi, EU Artificial Intelligence Directive’nin yüksek risk sınıflandırması ve kişisel veri mevzuatı; ISO 42001 dokümantasyonuyla birlikte düşünülmesi ğretilir.
- KVKK guide title by title
- EU regulation risk classes
- Automated decision and data protection
A comprehensive program ranging from getting to know the standard to a company-specific road map.
Program; It can be adapted as two days basic, three days practitioner or five days auditor competency, depending on the institution's artificial intelligence maturity and target calendar.
Standard, risk method and daily practice meet in the same program.
Training makes learning permanent through real artificial intelligence scenarios.
Katılımcılar yalnızca dinlemez; yapay zeka kullanım inventory çıkarır, politika yazar, risk ve etki değerlendirmesi yapar, dış servis kullanımını sorgular ve kendi kurumları için yol haritası tasarlar.
Adaptive training for all roles using, developing or purchasing AI.
At the end of the training, the institution's artificial intelligence maturity becomes measurable and sustainable.
Participant gains
- ISO 42001’in ne istediğini sade bir dille anlatabilme
- Ability to write artificial intelligence usage policy for the institution
- Ability to evaluate artificial intelligence risks in the right category
- Ability to evaluate and record impact
- Mapping lifecycle controls to business processes
- Ability to manage the use of ready-made artificial intelligence services
- Ability to meet the expectations in the KVKK productive artificial intelligence guide
Institutional outputs
- AI usage policy template
- Artificial intelligence committee terms of reference
- Yapay zeka kullanım inventory şablonu
- Risk assessment methodology and sample matrix
- Impact assessment template
- Ready-made artificial intelligence service usage checklist
- 90-day road map specific to the institution
Transform AI into a discipline governed by rules, records, and audits.
Plan a training program specific to your organization's needs, covering the expectations in the ISO 42001 standard and the KVKK productive artificial intelligence guide.
References: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Standard, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Guide, EU Artificial Intelligence Regulation, KVKK Guide for the Use of Productive Artificial Intelligence Tools in Workplaces.